Floor-led MLOps platform for AI inspection and robotics

Training to retraining unified as a single operating flow — reducing reliance on dedicated AI staff and enabling the floor team to continuously manage model performance.

Contact us

On-floor operating bottlenecks

Three breaks that surface in operations after inspection AI goes live

Resolve the core bottlenecks to respond to shifting environments and limited data on the floor.

Before

Manual collection and labeling delay model improvement

Datasets, judgment rules, and inspection history managed together, with retraining candidates surfaced automatically

After

Standardized data preprocessing and reduced repetitive workload

An operating loop for inspection AI beyond a one-time rollout

From data collection (AIVData) to model retraining (AIVOps), connected by an extensible architecture so investment doesn't get duplicated.

  1. 1

    Data preparation

    Inspection images and judgment rules are linked so retraining datasets are standardized.

  2. 2

    Model training

    Automated model search recommends parameters aligned to floor targets — usable even by non-specialists.

  3. 3

    Performance validation

    Recall, miss rate, and false-call rate are measured against the customer validation set to judge readiness for rollout.

  4. 4

    Deployment

    Models are rolled out, rollback paths are verified, and deployment records are kept under one trail.

  5. 5

    Feedback collection

    False positives, missed defects, and drift signals from operations are funneled back into the improvement cycle.

How we validate

Quantitative performance, measured on an agreed validation set

Instead of blanket headline numbers, we measure against the conditions on your floor and evaluate whether the targets are actually met.

*Actual figures vary with customer data and measurement conditions, and are reported in the PoC results summary.

  • Recall

    Share of true defects the model flagged as defects.

    Measured against the customer validation set, with missed cases cross-checked.

  • Miss rate

    Share of true defects passed through as OK — directly tied to quality risk.

    The acceptable range is agreed before PoC, and pass/fail is judged on those terms.

  • False call rate

    Share of good parts flagged as defects — directly tied to review load.

    We find the right balance against miss rate given line speed and reviewer capacity.

Core capabilities for floor-led operations

Designed to lighten the cost of hiring outside AI staff and keep the pipeline under the control of the people running the line.

  • Labeling

    AI auto-labeling

    AI detects and labels defect regions in inspection images — manual workload drops while dataset quality goes up.

  • Defect generation

    Defect data generation

    AI-generated defect samples supplement scarce real-world data and close coverage gaps.

  • Analysis

    Dataset analytics

    Label distribution, position, size, and inspection outcomes — visualized so dataset bias and improvement priorities surface fast.

  • Model recommendation

    Model & parameter recommendation

    Dataset and training analysis inform the next model and parameter set, supporting iterative tuning toward the target performance.

Adoption impact and operating efficiency, specialized for the manufacturing inspection domain

We cut the duplicated-investment risk of generic tools or one-off SI engagements, and provide inspection-specific capabilities built to scale.

Criteria

AI specialists

Operating architecture led by floor practitioners

Build in-house

Direct hiring and maintenance overhead

Generic MLOps tools

Tools only — separate operators required

One-off SI

External staff only during build

Things to confirm before rollout and integration

Check the questions we hear most often

Q.Can teams without AI expertise operate this?

It provides automated model discovery and standardized operating procedures, reducing the burden on dedicated AI personnel and enabling quality and production teams to handle training and Deployment directly. AIVEX engineers support initial setup and exception handling, lowering the barrier to adoption.

Q.Does it integrate with existing training pipelines and systems?

By adopting a scalable architecture, it reduces sunk costs in existing systems. The specific scope of integration is assessed during the PoC phase.

Q.Can it run on-premise or in air-gapped networks?

We support on-premise, private cloud, and hybrid environments while complying with on-site security and compliance requirements. We design deployment architectures tailored to site conditions to meet production network segmentation requirements.

Q.Can the entire operational process—from labeling and AI training to testing and deployment—be automated after data collection?

Yes, it is possible. AIV Ops establishes a Continuous Training and Integration/Deployment (CT/CI/CD) pipeline to execute the entire AI operational process fully automatically based on specific cycles or conditions. It minimizes administrator intervention while providing automated reports (Model Cards) that display the model's training results and transparency at a glance.

Experience proven AI innovation
firsthand on your floor

Based on your current data infrastructure and rollout flow, we review the PoC scope and the impact you can expect — together.